.
Feedback

Apartment Building for Empty Tangletown Lots

Project to come before city Planning Commission today.

Remember ? Turns out, big changes are in store for that little white-and-green shack next to the firehouse, much sooner than we thought.

Monday afternoon, developer Scott Carlston and his architects will present their plan for a 45-unit apartment building for that site to the Minneapolis Planning Commission. The Commission will meet at 4:30 p.m. in the Minneapolis City Council chambers at City Hall, and will take public testimony for and against the proposal.

Carlston is also working on in Linden Hills that also goes before the Commission on Monday. It is not impacted by a on new large developments because its application was submitted before the moratorium was introduced.

To go forward, Carlston's proposed building (plans posted at right) needs a conditional use permit from the city to let it rise three feet above the zoning limits, from 3 to 4 stories and from 42 feet to 45 feet. In their filing with the city council (posted at right), city planning officials write that they think the additional cars won't overwhelm the nearby roads. City officials cite Carlston's provision of 11 more parking spaces and twice the number of bike racks required by zoning. Residents' cars would exit through a driveway onto Nicollet, between the development and the .

The project also needs permission to pack slightly more apartments into the design than currently allowed. 

Nicollet has been referred to as "Minneapolis' Main Street." Several city planning efforts have tried to encourage development to concentrate on major roads like Nicollet and at community business nodes like 54th and Nicollet, and the proposed development is near several large apartment buildings.

This article originally stated that Carlston's 46th and France building was covered by the Linden Hills building moratorium.
Joe Hoover April 23, 2012 at 02:45 pm
I remember as a kid growing up around the neighborhood - when it was not as nice as it is now, that little building was a "Spa" that offered "massages" and I am sure they were the kind that offered "Happy endings".
James Sanna (Editor) April 23, 2012 at 02:59 pm
A spa? It's got the right colors...but it looks like an ex-gas station. Although I suppose a drive-through spa would do quite well, "happy endings" or no.
Janne April 23, 2012 at 03:22 pm
Minneapolis is so in need of additional homes and choices for where to live. People want to be here, and the local businesses need the customers. Both these proposals are good news -- now, to make sure they add to the streets where they may be built!
James Sanna (Editor) April 23, 2012 at 03:54 pm
I wonder what would happen if the Planning Commission (mostly made up of architects) started critiquing the job done by a development's architects, on top of their legalistic debates? Might make these hearings a little less dry—Simon Cowell the architect!
byron anfinson April 23, 2012 at 04:21 pm
This is a good fit for a good building. Nicollet is where residents want to live. The city should pass this easily.
(Plus the history of the lot should make it an interesting sell...)
Michael Wilson April 23, 2012 at 07:32 pm
It would indeed make Planning Commission meetings more interesting if members were to critique building design. The problem is, though, that the architects' plans are typically not refined sufficiently for at that point for critiques of building materials, window treatments, etc. The developer and architects want to know whether they're headed in a direction that will gain approval for such things as building footprint, massing, shadowing, parking, traffic impacts, height, stepbacks, etc. They also need to know whether any requests for zoning changes, CUPs, and PUD are likely to be approved. Then they can proceed to spend more time (which equals money) on refining the building design.
Readers should be aware that Planning Commission approval is not the final word. Folks unhappy with PC approval can always appeal the decision to the City Council's Zoning & Planning Committee.
chris burns April 24, 2012 at 10:03 pm
You must not live in the area.
chris burns April 24, 2012 at 10:06 pm
WAY, WAY, WAY too big! It would be totally out of scale for a neighborhood that is mostly single family homes. 18 to 20 units if they absolutely must build and then maybe make it for seniors 55 and older.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Southwest Minneapolis Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mike B. June 9, 2013 at 04:59 pm
I had the same problem. I did see a person with an "Obama for President" bumper stickerRead More and a pro- "gay" marriage sticker drive off with some plants. Another Democrat stealing property.
Terry Brashear June 18, 2013 at 01:52 pm
Way to keep comments inline with the story. Trolls belong under bridges not on forums like this.
Gwen Voegtle June 4, 2013 at 03:50 pm
I am sorry to hear this happened to you. Theft from garages is kind of popular. They usually don'tRead More break in though. Glad you filed a police report and I hope you recover your property.
Mike B. June 5, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Sorry to say that you didn't have good information before moving to Minneapolis. Minneapolis isRead More plagued by crime, caused by the liberal mentality that prevents police from doing their jobs. Minneapolis and Hennepin County needs a strong sheriff, such as Sheriff Joe Arpaio from Arizona, to clean house and really crack down on the criminals that have destroyed vast swaths of Minneapolis.
Caitlin Burgess (Editor) April 12, 2013 at 08:51 pm
Comments from Southwest Minneapolis Patch's Facebook page: Laura Bischoff: "This all feelsRead More pretty hate-filled to me. An unfortunate outcome." Andrea Nicole Markley: "Yes, I thought the principal had done a pretty bang-up job of re-vamping Washburn's image."