patching...
Breaking: Police: Five Attempted Luring Incidents in Southwest Minneapolis »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Why Is the School District Drastically Cutting Local School Budgets?

Minneapolis Public Schools face a $25 million shortfall; cuts to the classroom and central office are proposed.

 

To long-time public school parents, painful budget cuts at neighborhood schools are nothing new, mostly driven by the economy or the state budget. This year, some of the hatchet blows are self-inflicted as the Minneapolis schools struggle to build a budget that doesn't rely on one-time accounting tricks.

Earlier this week, Minneapolis Public Schools officials released details of the proposed budget for the 2013-2014 school year to principals and parent leaders. Howls of protest greeted the package of cuts, with some calling the reductions "catastrophic." Friday morning, the school board's Finance Committee met to get a high-level overview of the proposal.

Much of the $25 million in cuts comes to the district's attempt to stop relying on what district Chief Financial Officer Robert Doty and Budget Director Sarah Snapp called the "crutch" of money from the district's reserves, called its "fund balance." That money, Doty said, should only be reserved for emergencies like the 2011 state government shutdown, rather than trying to paper over a structurally unbalanced budget. The current budget uses $19 million in reserve funds to close its budget gap. In the last three years, the district's fund balance has hovered between $80 and 90 million; the current fund balance, Snapp said, is only enough to cover six weeks of operations.

"We don't have the ability to go back to that well again and again," Doty said.

At the same time, the district is also coming down off of several years of one-time federal aid dolled out by President Barack Obama's 2009 stimulus package, intended to keep the district afloat when the bottom fell out of the economy—and its tax base. In past years, the district also used some of that money to help close its budget deficit. The current budget leans on around $2 million in this one-time federal aid.

"If your grandmother sends you a check for your birthday and you go out to dinner with it, fine," Snapp told Patch in an interview after Friday's meeting. "But if you pay the rent with that, unless you have a birthday every month, you're going to have a problem."

"The stimulus delayed the point at which we needed to confront that we were structurally out of balance," she added.

Concerned parents may dispute the wisdom of launching a balanced budget campaign right now, but other, substantial portions of the $25 million deficit are being driven by forces not of the district's making.

Elementary-age students are surging into the city's public schools, forcing the district to add classrooms—and associated teachers and support staff. Because of how state education funding works, Snapp said, the district is not getting enough money to offset those costs. One rare point of agreement between district staff and concerned parents at Friday's meeting was that the current state funding setup needs to change, to increase per-student state aid. Board members urged parents to get involved with statewide parent-run lobby group Parents United for Public Schools, to help force change.

On top of that, state lawmakers are trying to reform the way desegregation money is allocated, and their current proposal could cost Minneapolis schools $3 million.

Lastly, federal aid cut under the sequester will cost the district about $2 million, but that number could rise by an additional $5 million depending on decisions by the federal Department of Education.

Want to learn more? Check out our other coverage:

Related Topics: Minneapolis Public Schools, Minneapolis schools budget, Rebecca Gagnon, and Tracine Asberry

Steve Kotvis

7:15 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

Isn't another reason this and other public school districts are short on funds because the State withheld and continues to withholding a greater share (and amount) of funds it is obligated to distribute to the districts because the State used those funds to help balance its own budget? I have not heard of that obligation yet being met.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

James Sanna

8:37 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

@Steve - As I recall, the shifts involved the state delaying payments, not withholding them entirely. The problem for districts was that most of their costs came in the first half of the biennium, so they were forced to borrow if they didn't have a healthy fund balance, as Minneapolis did. The bigger the delayed payment, the more they'd have to borrow, and the more it would cost a district in interest payments. The refrain I heard over and over again on Friday from district folks was "increase per pupil aid" for elementary-aged kids. (a good primer on that here for folks who don't have Steve's years of schools experience: http://www.parentsunited.org/school-funding/layers-of-complexity/)

Patch_comments_icon

James Sanna

9:46 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013

In his story this morning, Steve Brandt mentions an additional detail I think I missed:

"Finance Chief Robert Doty has told credit rating agencies that the district would balance its budget for 2014. He had recommended a 7.4 percent property tax increase for 2014 to help do so, but the board imposed a 4 percent levy hike instead, forgoing $3.9 million."

http://www.startribune.com/local/minneapolis/198557591.html

Reply

Leave a comment